IT:AD:ETap

Summary

Notes

ACiD

  • Advantages:
    • Web based
  • Considerations:
    • Primary/intermediate (not secondary) school system.
      • Missing NCEA support, Pathways, Timetabling, period attendance (required for Secondary School)
      • Lower initial cost, slightly higher service cost than KAMAR.
  • Issues:
    • Had an issue in Q3/2016 where it was exposing at least student/doctor information.
  • Disadvantages:

Cost comparisons

  • KAMAR:
    • Features:
      • Secondary school system.
    • Installation:
      • KAMAR is a one-off setup cost of $6000, which includes setup, 12 hours on-site training (including expenses) plus initial * Rental:
        • pricing is a base cost, plus:
        • Students: $7.20 student/p/a on-site, $13.50 student/p/a hosted
        • Teachers:…
    • Training:
      • charge the same hourly rate for training
  • eTap:
    • Features:
      • eTap: primary / intermediate school solution only.
        • Excluded: NCEA support, Pathways, Timetabling, period attendance (all required for Secondary School).
    • Installation:
      • eTap has a one off setup cost or $1000 ($500 if < 100 students). Rental + training and travel expenses are extra.
    • Rental:
      • $200/classroom/p/a
      • $8.00/student/p/a
      • Minimum: $880 p/a.
    • Training:
      • ?

Resources